Whac-a-Mole Medicine

Whack A Mole.gif

For those of who have never played whac-a-mole, it was originally an arcade game with large circle shaped holes that each contain a mole that randomly pops up and down. Using a mallet you attempt to whack them back down and win points for your effort; the more difficult levels have multiple moles popping up at the same time.

Once a doctor has whacked one symptom, more pop up - perhaps due to side-effects of medication or because the symptoms a patient is presenting don’t coincide with the root cause of a disease, injury or disorder.

Every time a symptom pops up, it gets whacked with a prescription, a test or a scan with little or no thought into figuring out where the pesky moles are coming from or if there’s a way for them to stop popping up in the first place. These new symptoms are also whacked away with more medicine or treatment, yet even with more drugs (and more side effects) the person may hesitate to describe themselves as healthy.

When the root cause of any symptom is left unaddressed, the problem will continue to persist regardless of how many times the doctor whac-a-mole’s those symptoms with his medicine mallet. Curing a symptom is never a substitute for curing the cause and endless trips to the doctor will be one round after another of symptom-treating, possibly at significant cost to your health.


Health isn’t found in parts of the system but in the system as a whole
— @calmasarock

In IT, the term whac-a-mole is used to describe ‘a pervasive problem keeps recurring after it is supposedly fixed, or any situation where some type of undesirable outcome is recurring.’ Dr. Dan Kalish used the term in his 2012 book as an analogy of the current American healthcare system, which has become increasingly dependent on the use of medicines to eradicate symptoms instead of curing disease.

Modern allopathic or conventional medicine appears to not understand or be interested in addressing the root cause of symptoms and has devolved into the pursuit of controlling symptomatic indicators by prescribing medication. Some GPs here in the UK have spent the last 16 months taking phone calls and not seeing their patients in person at all; ironic considering that in our lifetime there is a good chance these same doctors will be find themselves out of a job, replaced by Artificial Intelligence. Researchers at the John Radcliffe Hospital in Oxford, England, have developed an AI diagnostics system that’s more accurate than doctors at diagnosing heart disease, at least 80% of the time. Anyone who has experienced the near-impossible task of getting an appointment for a doctor in the UK may not need that much persuading to switch over when the time comes.